This is years late.
….four years late. It’s late because when either of us tried to talk about it in the early years, it was anger. You wouldn’t hear a story when we spoke, you’d hear anger. Hopefully, you can hear the story this time. The anger has settled.
….
This month, four years ago, we had sailed through much of the adoption work with nary a problem. Our social worker said we were about six months from having an HIV+ sibling set from Vietnam in our home in Cambodia.
We’d asked adoptive parents in ministry how to navigate adoption and missions/ministry.
We’d asked an American nurse who had volunteered in Cambodia’s healthcare system how well-equipped Cambodia was for the needs of HIV+ children. Better than America, she said.
Basically, we thought through who in our circle would have the answers to the questions we were asking, and we paid attention to what they said.
A friend from the States had offered to fund-raise for our adoption on our behalf as our mission agency did not permit us to fund-raise for ourselves, but a person who volunteered to do it on our behalf was fine. We didn’t ask her to volunteer, so her offer was incredibly generous and still gives me joy to remember. Thank you, Sandra!
We’d chosen a sibling set instead of only one because of research that says that sibling loss is more traumatic to orphans than loss of parents. Sibling sets actually do not substantially increase adoption cost, and the presence of a biological sibling becomes a major resiliency factor that significantly alleviates trauma issues related to the adoption.
We found a social worker who lived overseas, helping American missionaries and service members to adopt. If you think being American, in America, adopting from America is hard, try being American in Cambodia, adopting from God-knows-where. We chose Vietnam because it made the most sense at the time—different countries have different procedures. Cambodia was, and still is, closed to adoption.
We’d need to spend six weeks in Vietnam, but our mission agency allowed for a maternity leave for biological additions to family, and we’d be adding two children, not just one, so it fit. We’d use our vacation days if we had to. Plus, Cambodia was due for an election that year, and our adoption was looking like it would land right over the weeks when we’d need to leave Cambodia due to political turmoil anyways. It was a perfect fit, time-wise. Puzzle pieces made of magnets. It was coming together so fast and so well.
“Prepare for spiritual warfare if you adopt. Something always goes wrong.”-Friends who knew their stuff. Multiple people. More friends since then.
I blocked off afternoon naps, and began waking early, to push through the early grind of adoption work. So many emails with our social worker! So much to research. So much. Being expats was a big part of the workload here. (Fun fact: I started college after the adoption fell through, using those exact time blocks. No regrets.)
We’re six months away from having a sibling set in our home?! [Friend] wants to fund-raise for us?! Where’s the spiritual warfare? This feels too good to be true. If our friends are right, and they all said the same thing, something’s going to go wrong. But nothing is going wrong! And we’re so close!
I felt uneasy. I trusted my friends, and our adoption journey, although it involved a lot of work, wasn’t meeting any obstacle that could derail it. It was less “the devil’s gonna try to stop this” than my friends had warned, but I trusted them. I knew they knew what they were talking about. So, I had a sense of “What is it? What’s going to go wrong here? That many people—those people—aren’t going to be wrong on this.”
I remember thinking those thoughts as I ran up the stairs for the afternoon work towards adoption. Prophetic much, whew.
It was an email from an authority figure in our missions organization that ended it all in one fell swoop.
Adoption would distract from ministry. We would spend more time adopting than doing ministry. How can we explain this?
Easily.
I emailed back the truth: that Asian culture did not have many healthy examples of adoption—adoption is often only slightly better than labor trafficking or slavery—and we could be a daily display of the love that drives healthy adoption.
I tried to pull up the original email tonight so I could quote it verbatim. It was bad enough that the mission agency as a whole reached out to us to say that it was sent from one man, reflects his personal opinion, and they do not agree with the views he stated. We no longer log into that email address, or I’d copy/paste so you could see for yourselves how it read.
I remember phrases, though—probably not verbatim. Some are from the email, and some may be from Skype conversations with the same individual.
You have to fill out paperwork about the types of physical illnesses you’re okay with. Do you think you are prepared to think through that? We’d already decided that. We’d already relied on the wisdom of others in that process.
It’s going to take from your ministry. We believed it would enrich it.
Missions work is difficult, and adoption is difficult. You don’t have what it takes to do both. The sender of the email was an individual involved in our training, and in training, he had DRILLED us that we had everything we needed to do God’s will.
You are going to need to choose between missions or adoption. From an authority figure.
I ran downstairs.
“Chris, did you read it?”
Chris: “Yep, I read it.”
Me: “Is…is…that an ultimatum? It feels like an ultimatum. I can’t believe he gave us an ultimatum, though.”
Chris: “Missions OR adoption. Of course it’s an ultimatum!”
“So, missions or adoption. Which one do you choose?”
“Same one as you.”
….Adoption. We didn’t have to say the word in that conversation. We’d discussed it when dating. We both knew. Adoption, by far, had our hearts.
If we chose adoption, we were leaving Cambodia prematurely and we’d have to pay our own tickets. That would use up our adoption starter fund.
So by choosing adoption, we were choosing…neither. We’d have to wait to adopt.
But we couldn’t just shrug, stay in Cambodia, and let the conversation end there.
Chris tried to email a response, but he sent it to a trusted mentor first. “That’s too angry.”
I tried to email a response, but it was simply slightly more eloquent anger.
Finally, three months later, we both calmed down enough to pick up this conversation.
“Oh, oh, you misunderstood me! That wasn’t an ultimatum! That was friendly, mentor-like advice.” He wasn’t a mentor. He was an authority figure.
I’m leaving his name out, because outside of this interaction, I have a lot of reasons to respect him. I’m not interested in throwing someone under the bus due to one interaction gone poorly. Perhaps it was truly a giant miscommunication on his part. It was a miscommunication that directly impacted our family, and two orphans who would otherwise have a family. It added to the list of frustrations we were already living with. He’s allowed to be a human and have a serious goof-up and still be respected. I wish him well, however strongly I disagree with him in this one discussion.
At this point, we were technically free to continue pursuing adoption, albeit with the caveat that we would be going against clearly stated advice from an authority figure. Our actual mentors were decidedly supportive, and those who had navigated our unique situation were excited about it. However, the questions that we couldn’t get past were these:
Is it wise to bring orphans into an extended family (which is what the missions culture is) that sees them as a burden to better, allegedly more important church work?
Would they not feel that?
Would they feel like they have to contribute to ministry, to “prove” that they earned their spot? I already felt this one. I felt that, if we went through with the adoption, we had to prove that it indeed added to the ministry. Nobody verbalized that at the time, to be clear. That may have been just me.
Unfortunately, Chris had been dealing with deep frustrations prior to this, and this adoption loss due to an authority figure overstepping bounds added to his frustrations. Deep, prolonged frustration became a faith crisis and Chris decided to move us back to America.
The starter fund for our adoption would be used on tickets.
The adoption was over.
….
To reiterate, for those who know the organization we were with: the organization as a whole has since assured us that they do not share the views conveyed in that email exchange. The organization is pro-adoption. The individual in that instance was not.
….
I still think about that sibling set.
I hope they’re not waiting for a family.
I hope someone else adopted the ones who were so few obstacles away from being ours.
When we pursue adoption again, we’ll start from scratch. HIV+? Don’t know. Siblings? Probably. Maybe. Vietnam? I prefer to stay as local as possible, and that is no longer Vietnam, but Vietnam still has a pull, I won’t lie. Age? I hope toddlers, Chris would prefer teens. I like teens, so it’s quite possible that we’ll wait until our current kiddos are bigger and then adopt some teens—but even that is not certain. When? God knows.





